In November 2024, Colorado voters passed Proposition 129, which has sparked intense debate within the veterinary community and beyond. The proposal outlines a new framework for veterinary professionals in the state and aims to create a new category of veterinary professionals, “Veterinary Professional Associates.” However, its passage has led to a significant divide—one that may be fueled more by incomplete information than by a thorough understanding of the full scope of the proposal.
The core of Proposition 129 seeks to establish a tiered system of veterinary professionals. The bill proposes the creation of a new, formalized career track for a midlevel veterinary practitioner who can perform a range of veterinary tasks after completing a master’s program through Colorado State University, the majority of which will be online.
What makes this topic especially polarizing is that much of the debate has occurred in the absence of comprehensive, clear communication about the education and experience of those wishing to enter the master’s program, as well as how the new roles will be implemented.
Advocates argue that this new role could help alleviate the burden on licensed veterinarians, address the growing shortage of veterinary professionals, and improve accessibility to veterinary care, especially in underserved areas. Supporters of Proposition 129 argue that the proposal is a necessary step to modernize the veterinary field. They emphasize that these new professionals would operate under the supervision of licensed veterinarians, ensuring that patient care would not be compromised.
However, opponents are concerned about the implications of this new framework, particularly the lack of clarity around the qualifications, scope of practice, and oversight of these newly proposed professionals. Some fear that the new category could lead to compromised standards of care or a dilution of the profession’s integrity. Furthermore, critics worry that the proposal has been rushed through without enough input from those who would be directly impacted—licensed veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and industry experts.
At its core, Proposition 129 raises important questions about the future of the veterinary profession in Colorado. How can the state balance the need for expanded veterinary care with the need to maintain high standards of professional practice? And what role do stakeholders—veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and others—play in shaping these decisions? And how long will it be until other states follow suit and propose similar changes?
It’s clear that Proposition 129 will continue to be a topic of heated discussion in the coming months. However, moving forward, it is essential that all sides of the debate have access to complete, accurate information so that the profession can address both the challenges and opportunities posed by this new proposal. Ongoing dialogue, education, and collaboration will be crucial to ensuring that the interests of animals, clients, public health, and veterinary professionals are all carefully considered as decisions are made regarding this evolving new role.