Source: AAHA
A new framework for assessing dog bite risk could improve how veterinarians, behaviorists, and legal authorities evaluate potentially dangerous dogs. Instead of relying on brief, stressful behavioral tests conducted in unfamiliar environments, researchers at the University of Lincoln propose adapting structured professional judgment methods used in human forensic psychology. The approach considers multiple factors, including a dog’s behavioral history, medical condition, pain, home environment, owner management practices, and household dynamics.
Researchers argue that current assessments often lack scientific support and may lead to unfair or inaccurate decisions, including euthanasia. The framework also emphasizes that unmanaged pain is a common but overlooked cause of aggression and encourages veterinarians to screen for behavioral changes during routine visits. By focusing on prevention, education, and individualized risk assessment rather than breed stereotypes or isolated observations, the proposed model aims to reduce dog bites, improve public safety, and promote fairer outcomes for both dogs and their owners.